Unlock the 7-Sec Caliber Zeroing Tool Now

Hey,

Our team of renegade engineers just developed an advanced sighting tool that changes everything.

Imagine getting the best zero or your entire shooting life... without firing a single round.

Zero ammo. Zero range trips. Zero frustration.

This little device allows you to get a sub-MOA zero on any rifle, carbine, handgun or even shotgun -- 100% safely and from the comfort of your own home.



The NEW Boar by MCG Tactical comes with an 18-piece set of caliber guides that adapts it to ANY caliber, no matter if you're using a .17 HMR or a 12GA slug.

And not only are batteries included, but this bad boy packs a premium lithium battery that's USB rechargeable.

And to make this deal a total no-brainer, I'm picking up the shipping and handling.

So start saving money on ammo AND getting the best zero of your life today while I'm running this limited time sale!

Get your MCG Boar 54% OFF here (Free S&H)

Sheila








 

vices Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 (Aon v ANU) is a decision by the High Court of Australia (High Court). After a bushfire destroyed property and equipment at the Australian National University's (ANU) Mount Stromlo campus near Canberra, the university lodged an insurance claim. After its insurers disputed the claim on various grounds, ANU commenced legal proceedings against them, later adding its insurance broker, Aon, to the proceedings, arguing it had been negligent in placing the insurance policies. After settling with the insurers, ANU was granted the right to amend their case against Aon. Aon challenged the decision to allow this amendment in the High Court. The High Court confirmed that the right for a party in a court case would not be granted sheerly because an amendment raises an arguable issue, but only according to the principles of effectively managing legal cases to justly resolve the issues between the parties. Aon v ANU reversed the previous decision of Queensland v JL Holdings which had held the most important consideration when assessing such a request was the consideration of justice, and that any inconvenience to the other party was curable by awarding costs against the am